| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
Ubiquity and cross platform support is a major goal for OSIS and the identity meta-system in general
Red Hat’s participation in OSIS is emblematic in conveying the industry’s convergence around Information Cards as a way to build the Identity Metasystem.
The identity-capable platform is a strong complement to identity infrastructure, not competition for it…
According to Phil Windley, this is really a historic development in the Internet identity space
It turns out that it really isn’t hard to architect identity systems to include freedom and choice, though it might not be what one would create if the issue were not considered.
The involvement of identity management heavyweight Novell in developing open source Information Cards is significant. It moves us all closer to the identity big bang.
There are three distinct steps to any Phishing attack.
We’ve tried to do what our colleagues have been asking for. “Information Cards” aren’t tied to any vendor or implementation
“I can imagine the Infocard concept becoming the new federation user experience.”
Should we really be talking about an island of security? Or does ‘deperimeterization’ imply secure things can just happen?