{"id":654,"date":"2007-01-20T12:35:26","date_gmt":"2007-01-20T20:35:26","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=654"},"modified":"2007-01-20T12:45:52","modified_gmt":"2007-01-20T20:45:52","slug":"identity-crisis-podcast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/?p=654","title":{"rendered":"Identity Crisis Podcast"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/reader\/1930865856\/ref=sib_dp_pt\/002-9640983-4935230#reader-link\"><img title=\"Identity Crisis\" alt=\"Identity Crisis\" src=\"\/wp-content\/images\/2007\/01\/identity-crisis.jpg\" align=\"right\" \/><\/a> If you haven&#39;t read Jim Harper&#39;s book, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/reader\/1930865856\/ref=sib_dp_pt\/002-9640983-4935230#reader-link\">Identity Crisis: How Identification Is Overused and Missunderstood<\/a> I urge you to do so as soon as you can.<\/p>\n<p>I was initially a bit&nbsp;skeptical about this book because&nbsp;&#8211; I hope my more politically inclined friends will forgive me &#8211; it was published by&nbsp;what I assume is a&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cato.org\">political &#8220;think tank&#8221;<\/a>.&nbsp; I&nbsp;worried it might reflect some kind of ideology, rather than being a dispassionate examination of reality.<\/p>\n<p>But in this case I was wrong, wrong, wrong.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Jim Harper really understands identification.&nbsp; And he is better than anyone at explaining what identification systems&nbsp;<strong>won&#39;t do<\/strong> for us &#8211; or our institutions.&nbsp;He carefully explains why many of the proposed uses of identification are <strong>irrational&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;<\/strong>delivering results that are quite unrelated to what they are purported to do.&nbsp; In my view, getting this message out is just as important as explaining what identity <strong>will do<\/strong>.&nbsp; In fact it is a prerequisite for the identity big-bang.&nbsp; There are two sides to this equation an we need to understand them both.<\/p>\n<p>He directly takes on the myth that if only we knew what peoples&#8217; identifiers were, &#8220;we would be safe&#8221;.&nbsp;&nbsp;Metaphorically, he is&nbsp;asking what kind of plane we would rather fly in &#8211; one where the passengers&#8217; identifiers have been checked&nbsp;against a database&nbsp;or one where they and their luggage have been screened for explosives and guns?&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I think he will convey to &#8220;lay people&#8221; why a so-called &#8220;blacklist&#8221;&nbsp;is one of the weakest forms of protection,&nbsp;showing that&nbsp;all you have to do is impersonate <em>anyone not on it<\/em> to sneak through the cracks.<\/p>\n<p>The book is full of important discussions.&nbsp; It has chapters like &#8220;Use identification less&#8221; and&nbsp;&#8220;Use authorization more.&#8221;&nbsp; I have only one criticism of the book.&nbsp; I would like to see us separate the notion of identity, on the one hand,&nbsp;and individual identification (or identifiers) on the other.&nbsp;&nbsp;We need&nbsp;return&nbsp;to the original meaning of identity: <em>the fact of being who or what a person or thing is.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>As a simple&nbsp;example,&nbsp;suppose I&#39;m a service provider building&nbsp;a chat room for children, and want to limit&nbsp;participation to children who are between 12 and 15.&nbsp; Let me contrast two ways of&nbsp;doing this.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In the first, all the children are given an identifier.&nbsp;&nbsp;To get into the room,&nbsp;they&nbsp;present their&nbsp;identifier and&nbsp;prove they are the person to whom that identifier was given.&nbsp; Then the&nbsp;chatroom system&nbsp;does a lookup in&nbsp;some&nbsp;public system&nbsp;linking identifier and age to make the access control decision.<\/p>\n<p>In the second, the children are given a &#8220;digital claim&#8221; that they are of some age, and a way to prove they are the person to whom that&nbsp;&#8220;claim&#8221; was given.&nbsp; The chatroom system just&nbsp;queries the claim to see if it meets its criteria.&nbsp; There is no reference to&nbsp;any public or even private identifier.<\/p>\n<p>My point is that the first mechanism involves use of an identifier.&nbsp; The second&nbsp;still involves identity &#8211; in the sense of <em>being what a person is &#8211; <\/em>but the identification, so rightly put into question by&nbsp;Jim&#39;s book, has been put into the trashcan where it belongs.<\/p>\n<p>The use of an identifier in our first example&nbsp;breaks&nbsp;the second <a href=\"\/?p=354\">Law of Identity<\/a> (Data Minimization &#8211; release no more data than necessary). It breaks the third Law too (Fewest Parties &#8211;&nbsp;since it&nbsp;discloses use of information to&nbsp;a central database&nbsp;unnecessary to the transaction).&nbsp;&nbsp; Finally, it breaks the Fourth Law (using an omnidirectional identifier when none is required).<\/p>\n<p>The book was written before &#8220;claims-based thinking&#8221; began to gain mindshare, and so it&#39;s missing as a category&nbsp;in Jim&#39;s discussion of advanced identity technologies.&nbsp; But&nbsp;we&#39;ve&nbsp;talked extensively about these&nbsp;issues and we have concluded that we have no theoretical difference &#8211;&nbsp;in fact&nbsp;the alignment between his work and&nbsp;the Laws of Identity struck us both as remarkable given that we come at these issues from such different starting points.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Jim&#39;s book is wonderful reading.&nbsp; It&nbsp;should help&nbsp;newcomers&nbsp;better understand the Laws of Identity.&nbsp; And this week the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cato.org\/event.php?eventid=3370\">Cato Institute<\/a> in Washington held an event at which Jim spoke, along with <strong>James Lewis,<\/strong> Director and Senior Fellow, Technology and Public Policy Program Center for Strategic and International Studies; and <strong>Jay Stanley,<\/strong> Public Education Director, Technology and Liberty Project American Civil Liberties Union.<\/p>\n<p>Download the podcast or watch the video <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cato.org\/event.php?eventid=3370\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jim Harper speaks about the &#8220;Identity Crisis&#8221; &#8211; how identification is overused and misunderstood<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":68,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6,17,2,3,20,11],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/654"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/68"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=654"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/654\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=654"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=654"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=654"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}