{"id":573,"date":"2006-09-11T08:37:52","date_gmt":"2006-09-11T16:37:52","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=573"},"modified":"2006-09-11T08:37:52","modified_gmt":"2006-09-11T16:37:52","slug":"what-you-have-versus-what-you-are","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/?p=573","title":{"rendered":"What you have versus what you are"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/bendrath.blogspot.com\/2006\/09\/biometrics-and-what-you-have-vs-what.html\">Ralf Bendrath<\/a> sees biometrics as being about &#8220;what you have&#8221; (had?)&nbsp;rather than&nbsp;&#8220;what you are&#8221;.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Kim Cameron at Identityblog <a href=\"\/?p=570\">picked up<\/a> on Jerry Fishenden&#39;s <a href=\"http:\/\/ntouk.com\/?view=plink&#038;id=187\">post<\/a> on the problems of biometrics (by the way: Jerry will speak at our privacy workshop in Athens, see <a href=\"http:\/\/bendrath.blogspot.com\/2006\/09\/call-for-proposals-academic-conference.html\">below<\/a>). He again brings up the <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/world\/asia-pacific\/4396831.stm\">story from Malaysia<\/a>, where some brutal car thieves cut off the index finger of a Mercedes owner in order to circumvent the biometric engine lock. First of all, the thieves could have had it <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ccc.de\/biometrie\/fingerabdruck_kopieren\" class=\"broken_link\">much easier<\/a>, also without having to carry around a rotting finger. With a bit more high-tech, in the future they could maybe just read the fingerprint out of the car owner&#39;s passport.<\/p>\n<p>But more important, this case shows the problems with identity and how hard it is to proof to a machine who you are. It is often based on the classic trinity of authentication, which either can be done by <span style=\"font-style: italic\">something you have<\/span> (a key, a USB dongle, a chipcard), <span style=\"font-style: italic\">something you know<\/span> (a password, a PIN, your mother&#39;s maiden name), or <span style=\"font-style: italic\">something you are<\/span> (your fingerprint, your retina). There are of course <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Authentication_factor\">other possible authentication factors<\/a>, but these are the most common.<\/p>\n<p>This story makes clear that &#8220;what you have&#8221; is much clearer than &#8220;what you are&#8221;. I would prefer saying &#8220;I have ten fingers&#8221; instead of &#8220;I am ten fingers&#8221;. &#8220;What I am&#8221; relates more directly to my personality \/ identity than &#8220;what I have&#8221; or &#8220;what I know&#8221;. It is a <a href=\"http:\/\/notabob.blogspot.com\/2005\/08\/identity-is-story.html\">story<\/a>, a flowing amorphous thing, changing from context to context and over time. Of course, you can break it down <span style=\"font-style: italic\">to some extent<\/span> to single pieces of data (address, date of birth, employer, email, favourite mp3s, &#8230;) &#8211; but this is all not good for authentication purposes, as most of it is not really secret. &#8220;What I know&#8221; can be secret, and as Jerry Fishenden points out in his post, could be linked to &#8220;what I have&#8221; in order to have multi-factor authentication. But it again is not the same as &#8220;what I am&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Biometrics therefore is more about what I <span style=\"font-style: italic\">have<\/span> than what I <span style=\"font-style: italic\">am<\/span>. The only difference is that it can&#39;t be stolen as easily as a car key or a passport. Fingers can be cut off, but faces? Ok, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0119094\/\">Hollywood<\/a> was always ahead of us.<\/p>\n<p>Last open question: Can &#8220;what you have&#8221; also be said about <a href=\"http:\/\/www-static.cc.gatech.edu\/gvu\/perception\/\/projects\/hid\" class=\"broken_link\">the way you walk<\/a>? Probably not. But is that really what you are?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ralf would prefer saying &#8220;I have ten fingers&#8221; instead of &#8220;I am ten fingers&#8221;.  He has a point. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":68,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6,17,2,11],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/68"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=573"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=573"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=573"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=573"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}