{"id":499,"date":"2006-07-28T13:53:19","date_gmt":"2006-07-28T21:53:19","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=499"},"modified":"2006-07-28T14:02:42","modified_gmt":"2006-07-28T22:02:42","slug":"o2s-free-monthly-handset-teaches-how-to-be-phished","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/?p=499","title":{"rendered":"O2&#8217;s FREE monthly handset teaches how to be phished"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The relationships between&nbsp;enterprises and their &#8220;designated agents&#8221; are often pretty murky from a customer point of view.&nbsp; In the old days,&nbsp;few people cared.&nbsp; But&nbsp;in the world of phishing, we need a lot more clarity about who is representing&nbsp;whom &#8211; we need to know if an offer originates from a someone legitimate or not.<\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"http:\/\/www.links.org\/?p=120\">this post<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.links.org\/\">Ben Laurie<\/a> shows just how hard&nbsp;the current identity&nbsp;patchwork (read <em>&#8220;architectural black hole&#8221;<\/em>)&nbsp;makes it to know&nbsp;what is going on &#8211; even if you&#39;re one of the top Internet security people in the world.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Ben&nbsp;tells us, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.o2.co.uk\/\">O2<\/a> like phishing&#8230;&#8221;:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>They must do, or they wouldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t do stupid things like this.<\/p>\n<p>I got an email, looking just like this:<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-left: 30px\">We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d like to say \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcthanks\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 for being a great customer by offering you either a FREE Pay Monthly handset upgrade OR \u00a3100 credit added to your account \u00e2\u20ac\u201c provided you haven\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t recently upgraded.\u00e2\u20ac&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>And it couldn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t be easier. All you have to do is renew your contract with O2 before 31st August 2006.<\/p>\n<p>If you choose to renew your contract for 18 months, rather than 12 then there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s even more on offer:<\/p>\n<p>If you prefer to talk we have a range of Talker plans with Double Minutes each month*. For example, on an Online 500 Talker plan you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll get 1000 minutes and 150 messages each month for \u00a335.<\/p>\n<p>If you prefer to text we also have a range of Texter plans which offer 50% Extra Minutes and Texts each month*.<\/p>\n<p>For example, on an Online 500 Texter plan you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll get 750 mins and 750 messages each month for \u00a335.<\/p>\n<p>To see our full range of handsets and offers and to renew your contract, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.o2-mail.co.uk\/o2.asp\" class=\"broken_link\">click here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>And thanks again for choosing O2 .<\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac&nbsp; The information used in this mailing is based on your contract status as at 30th April 2006. Unfortunately, if you upgraded after this date your new contract means you won\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t be eligible for these offers. Terms and conditions apply.<\/p>\n<p>*Offer subject to ongoing connection to eligible tariff see letter for details. Promotional allowances must be used within the month. Unused allowances cannot be carried over into subsequent months.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>OK, I removed some maybe-identifying data from the link, but you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll notice the link goes to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.o2-mail.co.uk\/\">http:\/\/www.o2-mail.co.uk\/<\/a>. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Oho\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, says I, being a suspicious sort, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not O2\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s website, I wonder who managed to register it?\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-left: 30px\">$ whois o2-mail.co.uk&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Domain name:<br \/>\no2-mail.co.uk<\/p>\n<p>Registrant:<br \/>\nVertis<\/p>\n<p>Registrant type:<br \/>\nUK Individual<\/p>\n<p>Registrant\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s address:<br \/>\nThe registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their<br \/>\naddress omitted from the WHOIS service.<\/p>\n<p>Registrant\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s agent:<br \/>\nMCI Worldcom Ltd [Tag = UUNETPIPEX]<br \/>\nURL: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.uk.uu.net\/\" class=\"broken_link\">http:\/\/www.uk.uu.net\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Relevant dates:<br \/>\nRegistered on: 01-Aug-2003<br \/>\nRenewal date: 01-Aug-2007<br \/>\nLast updated: 04-Aug-2003<\/p>\n<p>Registration status:<br \/>\nRegistered until renewal date.<\/p>\n<p>Name servers:<br \/>\nns0-o.dns.pipex.net<br \/>\nns1-o.dns.pipex.net<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Hmmm, a non-trading individual who wants to renew my phone contract, eh? Think I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d better check that out &#8211; but what a shame, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.uk.uu.net\/\" class=\"broken_link\">http:\/\/www.uk.uu.net\/<\/a> doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t actually resolve, so looks like I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m not talking to them. And, oh dear, Nominet are closed until Monday, so that avenue is out, too.<\/p>\n<p>The mail itself, incidentally, purports to come from o2-email.com, a domain which they didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t even bother to register.<\/p>\n<p>So, fearing nothing, I clicked on the link &#8211; which redirects me to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.o2renew.co.uk\/\" class=\"broken_link\">http:\/\/www.o2renew.co.uk\/<\/a>. Here we go again.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-left: 30px\">$ whois o2renew.co.uk&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Domain name:<br \/>\no2renew.co.uk<\/p>\n<p>Registrant:<br \/>\nAIS Group Ltd<\/p>\n<p>Registrant type:<br \/>\nUK Limited Company, (Company number: 3561278)<\/p>\n<p>Registrant\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s address:<br \/>\nBerners House<br \/>\n47-48 Berners St<br \/>\nLondon<br \/>\nW1T 3NF<br \/>\nGB<\/p>\n<p>Registrant\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s agent:<br \/>\nGlobal Registration Services Ltd [Tag = GRS]<br \/>\nURL: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.globalregistrationservices.com\/\" class=\"broken_link\">http:\/\/www.globalregistrationservices.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Relevant dates:<br \/>\nRegistered on: 14-Apr-2005<br \/>\nRenewal date: 14-Apr-2007<br \/>\nLast updated: 27-Jul-2005<\/p>\n<p>Registration status:<br \/>\nRegistered until renewal date.<\/p>\n<p>Name servers:<br \/>\nns25.worldnic.com<br \/>\nns26.worldnic.com<\/p><\/div>\n<p>At least this has an address, if I could be bothered to follow up, which I can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t, but this all looks a bit fishy. To compound the fun, I also got a text on my mobile with the same offer, but anyway, I phone O2 customer services. They explain that this cannot possibly be O2, it must be one of their \u00e2\u20ac\u0153marketing partners\u00e2\u20ac\u009d who will, if I fill in the form, renew my contract with O2, but via them. And, presumably, or maybe not, give me a new phone. I ask where they got my email address and phone number, and the answer is that at some point I left a box ticked that said it was OK for partners to send me stuff.<\/p>\n<p>So, do O2 condone this practice, I ask? The answer is, apparently, that they do. They don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t even mind, it seems, that the website has O2 branding on it.<\/p>\n<p>If O2 is going to allow people they have contractual relationships with to do this kind of thing, how on Earth do they expect consumers to learn what is phishing and what is not?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Ben&#39;s aproach is the only one you can take with today&#39;s web technology.&nbsp; Basically, you need to know how to analyse subdomains and understand DNS paths.&nbsp; Given this, one wonders why O2&nbsp;condones the use of&nbsp;URLs worthy of the best phisher.&nbsp;&nbsp;It is cutting the&nbsp;last safety&nbsp;line we have been able to clutch between our fingers in trying to&nbsp;achieve even the most marginal&nbsp;Internet safety.<\/p>\n<p>Still, I&nbsp;find myself choking on the idea that&nbsp;for people to&nbsp;understand&nbsp;they are being phished,&nbsp;they need to understand subdomains and the intricacies of DNS.<\/p>\n<p>One of the&nbsp;great advantages of the way Information Cards work is that the site&nbsp;the user is&nbsp;visiting (in this case O2.co.uk) can&nbsp;specify its designated agents&nbsp;in a cryptographically secure fashion.&nbsp; In this case,&nbsp;O2 could specifify&nbsp;O2renew.co.uk as the entity the user should exchange identity information with.&nbsp; The user would be guaranteed that&nbsp;this was&nbsp;an extension of her relationship with O2, with O2renew acting as an agent of&nbsp;O2.co.uk.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With Information Cards, the site a person is visiting can specify its designated agents in a cryptographically secure way.  The ambiguity and associated phishing opportunities present in today&#39;s web become a thing of the past.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":68,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6,8,7,4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/499"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/68"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=499"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/499\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=499"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=499"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.identityblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=499"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}